HOME ELECTRICAL DESIGN MECHANICAL DESIGN SOFTWARE DESIGN BUDGET ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Bluetooth Module

Breadboard Prototyping

Hand-soldered Circuit

Proto Board Integration

Arduino based PCB

PCB Prototype A

Microcontroller based PCB

PCB Prototype B

Final Electronics

ELECTRICAL DESIGN

A summary of the electrical system in Sole Searching - the important ingredients that can be used to prototype a similar system.

We developed and prototyped a system which is capable of taking map instruction via bluetooth, and producing the necessary output for indicating direction using vibrating motors. We started with prototyping the bluetooth module circuit on a breadboard and simulating the idea of directional aids using Arduino IDE. We worked towards a functional PCB with an ATMEGA 328P-AU microprocessor which does all the computations and controls the I/O devices and can be safely mounted in a shoe - a product that can be integrated with mechanical system as well as the software system in an easy and intuitive manner.

DESIGN PROCESS

A step-by-step walk-through into our design phases and a technical overview.

  1. Exploring various parts and possibilities - We tested the Bluetooth Module (HC-05) and made a simple mobile app using the MIT App Inventor to act as a dummy for the final version of our mobile application. The first goal was to control I/O devices using our phone, and we achieved that during the first sprint. Our proof-of-concept was a working breadboard prototype that we could use to control LEDs using our phones.

  2. Bluetooth

  3. Integration and refinement - Once the breadboard prototypes were all electrically sound, we moved on to putting together proto-board circuit for easier mechanical integration, making the electronics bay more compact, as well as lighter in weight in order to not cause hinderance in the walkability of the shoe. Additional to this, we started making schematics and designing a more formal electrical system. The hardware subteam came to a conclusion that it made a lot of sense to use a PCB to control the electronics - saving space, hardware mass, and adding redundancy to the system. We went through multiple phases of schematic reviews and PCB layout reviews with the teaching team, and shipped out a total of two iterations of two different designs of PCBs.

  4. ProtoBoard

  5. Debugging and iterating - We spent the rest of the time strategically: About half of it was spent debugging, testing, and repeating and the rest of it was spent in discussions about safety, manufacturability, comfort, and daily usability of the shoe with stakeholders and faculty. This involved redesign and development of the electronics casing, the location of the electronics embedding, and some components for the printed circuit board, among others.

  6. ProtoBoard

SCHEMATIC REVIEW

A description of the schematic iterations and PCB design

The main schematic includes the following sections:

  1. Power Conversion: We use a Lithium-ion battery input for the PCB at 3.7V. To step it up to 5V as required by some of the components on the PCB, including the HC-05 bluetooth module, we used a DC-DC Boost converter from Pololu.
  2. Bluetooth Module: We used the HC-05 bluetooth module to communicate to the PCB using a mobile application. All the power lines, as well as the I/O lines for this module are embedded in the PCB.
  3. Programming Header: Primarily used to program the microprocessor, and to power the board while in programming mode.
  4. Programming LEDs: Used as indicators to make the programming process easier to observe and test.
  5. Motors: A transducer that translates the electrical signals to vibratory motion for conveying direction information to the user in a handsfree manner.
  6. Accelerometer: For sensing the movement of the user to potentially measure activity data or motion-based commands.
  7. Computer: We used an ATMEGA 328P-AU to process information from and to control I/O devices. We used an external clock operating at 16MHz, and used the digital I/O pins to communicate with the rest of the hardware.

Here, we present the schematic for the electrical system.

ProtoBoard

This image shows the front copper layer of the PCB, showing all the traces and ground planes that we used in our design. Close to the center of the layout is the processor. Closer to the top edge of the layout are the connectors for interfacing with the motors, and the pads for the supporting hardware. The bluetooth module is mounted on to the bottom left side of the layout.
ProtoBoard

This image is a 3D rendering of the layout from the previous image.

ProtoBoard

The BOM:

Part References
Capacitor 0.1uF C3 C4 C7 C9
Capacitor 1uF C8
Capacitor 22uF C5 C6
Capacitor 33uF C1 C2
LED_0805 D1 D2 D4 D6
1x2 Connector J2 J3
1x3 Connector J1
1x6 Connector J5
40V 200mA NPN Transistor Q1 Q2
Resistor_499 R4 R5
Resistor_10k R2 R3 R6 R7 R8
Resistor_200 R1 R9
Accelerometer U2
ATmega328P-AU Microchip U2
Crystal Oscillator Y1

POST FINAL SPRINT UPDATES

A brief description of the final electrical system updates.

We passed the second iteration of the PCBs through more tests - both hardware and firmware. This includes compiling the program for the microcontroller and testing the supporting components to the microcontroller. Even though the board works well for our shoe system, we have made some final edits to the schematic. The most important edit was the correction in the integration of oscillator with the microcontroller.

Here, we present the schematic for the updated electrical system.

ProtoBoard

This image is a 3D rendering of the layout from the previous image.


ProtoBoard

CHALLENGES IN CIRCUIT DESIGN

  1. The size of the PCB was one of our biggest concerns. In order to fit our product onto a shoe and not hinder the normal walking, the PCB as well as the electronics case must appropriately designed. Thus, we decided to switch from using an Arduino Uno to an Arduino Nano, and finally to working on the chip level.
  2. We made some design errors in the integration of the external oscillator to the microcontroller. We debugged this error through Sprint 3 and post-sprint 3 and have updated the PCB and the schematic layout.
  3. Uploading the firmware to the microcontroller took a little bit of exploring the applications made by Atmel and the Arduino IDE.

A MODULE BASED PCB

A brief description of the PCB with connectors for plugging in of the shelf electrical hardware.

In order to have a backup for the case if we were not able to upload the program to the microcontroller, we designed a simpler, module-based PCB. We use an arduino nano to communicate with the bluetooth module over software serial, and to control the motors.

Here, we present the schematic for the module based electrical system.

ProtoBoard

This image is a 3D rendering of the layout from the previous image.


ProtoBoard

The Bill of Materials for Arduino Nano board

Part References
Arduino Nano v3 A1
Capacitor_0.1 uF C1 C2
LED_0805 D1 D2
1x2 Connector J2 J3
1x3 Connector J1
1x6 Connectors J5
1x8 Connector J4
MMBT3904 Q1 Q2
Resistor_499 R1 R2

FUTURE ITERATIONS

What would be our next step if we had another sprint in this project?

We would explore the world of rollers and processors. We really wanted to explore the ARM architecture by utilizing and setting up one - a good example could be the STM32F072RBTx by STMicroelectronics. We designed the specs for a similar version of the PCB from above, to work with an ARM Cortex, and we have presented that in the pictures below. Some of the reasons for this choice of moving from an AVR to an ARM architecture are mentioned here:

  1. The degree of connectivity that the two types can offer. The STM32WB microcontrollers integrate an ultra-low power 2.4GHz radio supporting Bluetooth 5.0 and IEEE 802.15.4 wireless communication protocols. This simplifies the schematic by reducing the components and modules that we need, but makes the setup process more difficult due to the complexity of the processor.
  2. ARM microprocessors are designed to perform fewer types of commands, compared to the AVR microprocessors, so they can operate at a much higher speed, performing extra millions of instructions per second (MIPS).
  3. Differences in power consumption by each of the two types.
  4. Differences in pricing for each of the two types.
  5. Differences in the ease of programming and compiling codes for each of the two types.
  6. Popularity of use in the industry and commercial spaces.

Here, we present the schematic for the electrical system with an STM Architecture.

ProtoBoard

This image shows the front copper layer of the PCB for the schematic shown above, showing all the traces and ground planes that we used in our design. Close to the center of the layout is the processor. Closer to the top edge of the layout are the connectors for interfacing with the motors, and the pads for the supporting hardware. The bluetooth module is mounted on to the bottom left side of the layout.

ProtoBoard

This image is a 3D rendering of the layout from the previous image.

ProtoBoard

SAFETY AND REDUNDANCY

How do we ensure the safety and usability of our product?

  1. Safety is the first priority for our product. We used a 3.7V 1000 mAh rechargeable lithium battery for the power supply. The whole circuit board is driven by a 5V voltage, which is converted from the 3.3V from the battery using a voltage booster.
  2. A lithium-polymer battery can provide high specific energy than other lithium batteries and are used in applications where weight and volume are critical features, like mobile devices. They work well in a large range of temperature.
  3. We specifically chose a 3.7V 1000mAh battery that satisfies the need of keeping the smart shoe working for 2-3 days, which fits the need for daily need.
  4. According to the manufacturer, there's no deformation, rupture or leakage in the battery within the applicable temperature.
  5. The battery pack is attached to the shoe via velcro connection, which ensures a simple attach-remove mechanism as well as avoids a high pressure on the battery.

ELECTRICAL DESIGN REFLECTION

Thoughts on "what could we have done differently?"

In this project, the learning goal of electrical subteam is to practice designing and manufacturing PCBs. We approached a working PCB by several steps: first, we designed a breadboard circuit with an Arduino Uno, which provides every connection portal we need, including motors, Bluetooth module and other mall components. Second, we moved from breadboard to protoboard, which largely reduced the size of our product so that it can be placed on a shoe. Then we extend to making our own PCBs. We designed two versions of PCBs: for the first one, we used modulized components including an Arduino Nano and the Bluetooth module. For the second one, the design of PCB starts from chip level. We selected a microprocessor and build up te rest of the circuit accordingly. Our next step of extending our project into a real product is to create circuit protection. By potting the circuit we prevent moisture and inner circuit shortage. We would unify the voltage across the board to be 3.3V: both the motors and the bluetooth main chip run on 3.3V, and the LiPo battery provides a constant potential difference of 3.3V as well. By doing so we can eliminate the voltage booster and make our product even smaller. We would also change from molex connection to a permanent, soldered connection to avoid broken circuit between the motors and the main PCB.